Fox News’s Future Could Be on the Line in a Reno Courtroom Right Now
This week may well see a court decide the fate and future of Fox “News” and thus the Republican Party, at least in its current hard-right neofascist form. And odds are Fox viewers are blissfully ignorant about the pitched battle in a Reno courtroom over the future of their beloved propaganda outlet.Sir Keith Murdoch was the notoriously racist and misogynist owner of a small newspaper chain in Australia. It was inherited by his son, Rupert, who—using sensationalism and bigotry—turned it into a multibillion-dollar enterprise that spans three continents.Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd called Rupert Murdoch “the greatest cancer on the Australian democracy” in the pages of The Sydney Morning Herald, which is the New York Times of Australia. Noting that Murdoch owns about “two thirds of the country’s print media,” Rudd wrote:In Britain, Murdoch made Brexit possible because of the position taken by his papers. In the United States, Murdoch’s Fox News is the political echo chamber of the far right, which enabled the Tea Party and then the Trump party to stage a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. In Australia, as in America, Murdoch has campaigned for decades in support of tax cuts for the wealthy, killing action on climate change and destroying anything approximating multiculturalism.When Rupert was divorcing his second wife, he put most of the family’s businesses into a trust, apparently to prevent a bitter family fight over his wealth. The terms of that trust stipulate that when Rupert dies, his four children—Lachlan, James, Elisabeth, and Prudence—would share equal votes and power over the business dynasty their father inherited from his father.But now Rupert—who’s 93 years old—is having second thoughts because James, Elisabeth, and Prudence are apparently not all that enthusiastic about Fox “News” and other Murdoch media outlets nakedly lying to and whipping up hatred among their viewers and readers, both here and in Australia and the U.K. Only Lachlan, Rupert’s oldest son, is loyal to his father’s vision of peddling hate for billions in profits.So Rupert went to court in Reno—the proceedings are sealed, but the case began last week and finished up (until appeals) Monday—to try to break the trust and hand exclusive or primary control of his fiefdom to Lachlan.Fox “News” viewers have no idea that they’re being constantly lied to, both by commission (like telling them the 2020 election was stolen by voting machines) and by omission. They think they’re seeing the world “as it is” and getting fair and balanced “truth” and “straight talk,” which is why Fox “News” is so potent.Without Fox “News” there probably never would have been a January 6 coup attempt, and, given how thin their margins were, likely no 2000 Bush or 2016 Trump presidencies.The stakes here are enormous. Some media observers believe that a major role in Barack Obama’s 2008 victory was Air America broadcasting liberal talk programs (including my own) to well over two-thirds of America with big stations in 62 major markets. (That ended when Mitt Romney decided to run for president and had his company buy Clear Channel, then flip all of the stations Air America was leasing from them from progressive talk to sports, killing the network in 2010.)Similarly, the rise of Fox, following Ronald Reagan fast-tracking Murdoch’s American citizenship, has played a huge role in Republican victories across the nation and the solid hold the GOP has on red-state America, where Fox and right-wing hate radio predominate.Activist investors in the Fox media caliphate have tried to force a vote at the upcoming shareholders’ meeting that would require Fox “News” to label its opinion programming—which constitutes most of its programming—as “opinion.” An attorney for the activist shareholder group, Luke Morgan, told US News & World Report:“There can hardly be a more significant issue for Fox than its misinformation problem. This is precisely the sort of issue that is appropriate for shareholder input.”Nonetheless, to Murdoch’s great delight, no doubt, the Securities and Exchange Commission ruled last week that Fox doesn’t have to start informing its viewers when its talent crosses the line from reporting to indoctrinating.Weirdly, this drama within an Australian family may well determine the fate and future of the Republican Party and the conservative and MAGA movements in the U.S. The future of democracy in America. It’s a real-life Succession drama and may take months to resolve.Keep an eye on this story. While it’s probably the most under-reported major news story in America right now, the outcome will have far-reaching consequences for all of us.
This week may well see a court decide the fate and future of Fox “News” and thus the Republican Party, at least in its current hard-right neofascist form. And odds are Fox viewers are blissfully ignorant about the pitched battle in a Reno courtroom over the future of their beloved propaganda outlet.
Sir Keith Murdoch was the notoriously racist and misogynist owner of a small newspaper chain in Australia. It was inherited by his son, Rupert, who—using sensationalism and bigotry—turned it into a multibillion-dollar enterprise that spans three continents.
Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd called Rupert Murdoch “the greatest cancer on the Australian democracy” in the pages of The Sydney Morning Herald, which is the New York Times of Australia. Noting that Murdoch owns about “two thirds of the country’s print media,” Rudd wrote:
In Britain, Murdoch made Brexit possible because of the position taken by his papers. In the United States, Murdoch’s Fox News is the political echo chamber of the far right, which enabled the Tea Party and then the Trump party to stage a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. In Australia, as in America, Murdoch has campaigned for decades in support of tax cuts for the wealthy, killing action on climate change and destroying anything approximating multiculturalism.
When Rupert was divorcing his second wife, he put most of the family’s businesses into a trust, apparently to prevent a bitter family fight over his wealth. The terms of that trust stipulate that when Rupert dies, his four children—Lachlan, James, Elisabeth, and Prudence—would share equal votes and power over the business dynasty their father inherited from his father.
But now Rupert—who’s 93 years old—is having second thoughts because James, Elisabeth, and Prudence are apparently not all that enthusiastic about Fox “News” and other Murdoch media outlets nakedly lying to and whipping up hatred among their viewers and readers, both here and in Australia and the U.K. Only Lachlan, Rupert’s oldest son, is loyal to his father’s vision of peddling hate for billions in profits.
So Rupert went to court in Reno—the proceedings are sealed, but the case began last week and finished up (until appeals) Monday—to try to break the trust and hand exclusive or primary control of his fiefdom to Lachlan.
Fox “News” viewers have no idea that they’re being constantly lied to, both by commission (like telling them the 2020 election was stolen by voting machines) and by omission. They think they’re seeing the world “as it is” and getting fair and balanced “truth” and “straight talk,” which is why Fox “News” is so potent.
Without Fox “News” there probably never would have been a January 6 coup attempt, and, given how thin their margins were, likely no 2000 Bush or 2016 Trump presidencies.
The stakes here are enormous. Some media observers believe that a major role in Barack Obama’s 2008 victory was Air America broadcasting liberal talk programs (including my own) to well over two-thirds of America with big stations in 62 major markets. (That ended when Mitt Romney decided to run for president and had his company buy Clear Channel, then flip all of the stations Air America was leasing from them from progressive talk to sports, killing the network in 2010.)
Similarly, the rise of Fox, following Ronald Reagan fast-tracking Murdoch’s American citizenship, has played a huge role in Republican victories across the nation and the solid hold the GOP has on red-state America, where Fox and right-wing hate radio predominate.
Activist investors in the Fox media caliphate have tried to force a vote at the upcoming shareholders’ meeting that would require Fox “News” to label its opinion programming—which constitutes most of its programming—as “opinion.” An attorney for the activist shareholder group, Luke Morgan, told US News & World Report:
“There can hardly be a more significant issue for Fox than its misinformation problem. This is precisely the sort of issue that is appropriate for shareholder input.”
Nonetheless, to Murdoch’s great delight, no doubt, the Securities and Exchange Commission ruled last week that Fox doesn’t have to start informing its viewers when its talent crosses the line from reporting to indoctrinating.
Weirdly, this drama within an Australian family may well determine the fate and future of the Republican Party and the conservative and MAGA movements in the U.S. The future of democracy in America.
It’s a real-life Succession drama and may take months to resolve.
Keep an eye on this story. While it’s probably the most under-reported major news story in America right now, the outcome will have far-reaching consequences for all of us.
