Hundreds of Russian military targets within range of Ukrainian ATACMS, ISW finds
ISW's report identifies 245 Russian military and paramilitary objects within ATACMS range. The study challenges US restrictions on Ukraine's use of long-range missiles, arguing that Russian asset redeployment does not diminish the strategic importance of these targets.
A new report by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has identified 245 known Russian military and paramilitary objects within range of Ukrainian ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System), challenging US restrictions on Ukraine’s use of these long-range missiles.
The study argues that US policy continues to restrict Ukraine from striking no fewer than 245 known Russian military and paramilitary objects, of which only 16 (6.5%) are air bases. This finding contradicts recent statements by anonymous senior US officials suggesting that the redeployment of Russian combat aircraft from airfields in Russia within ATACMS range somehow reduces the validity or importance of the Ukrainian request for these missiles.
According to the report, Politico reported on 23 August that an unnamed senior Biden administration national security official stated that Russian forces have moved some objects out of range of Western-provided Storm Shadow and ATACMS missiles. Another unnamed administration official reportedly claimed that Russian forces have moved 90 percent of the aircraft that conduct glide bomb strikes from Russian airspace away from airfields within range of Storm Shadow and ATACMS missiles.
However, the ISW argues that the redeployment of Russian aircraft from 16 Russian air bases in range of ATACMS does not reduce the importance of allowing Ukraine to use ATACMS against hundreds of other Russian military objects. The report states that at least 225 known objects are in range of ATACMS but not within the range of HIMARS, which the US allows Ukraine to use in Russia under limited circumstances.
The ISW emphasizes that at least 209 of 245 (over 85%) known Russian military objects in range of ATACMS are not air bases. The report suggests that Ukrainian forces are using indigenous long-range strike systems to hit some of these targets, but they do not appear to have many such systems.
The study also notes that Ukrainian officials are reportedly preparing to present senior US officials a list of objects in Russia that Ukrainian officials believe Kyiv could strike if Washington lifted its restrictions on US weapons.
Related:
- The Telegraph: UK quietly supports Ukraine’s Storm Shadow strikes in Russia
- EU top diplomat Borrell calls for lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s weapon use in Russia
- Frontline report: Ukraine uses new domestic missile drone for long-range strikes in Russia bypassing western weapons restrictions
- Zelenskyy urges to put pressure on partners to allow Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range weapons
- Politico: US resists lifting restrictions on long-range weapons amid Kursk success to not ruin relations “reset” with Moscow
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.
We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society.
A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support.
