Kursk operation shifts main battles to Russian soil, expert says
The Kursk incursion creates major problems for Russia, challenging its "red lines," and leading to the possible removal of Western restrictions on weapons use deep inside Russia.
British military expert Lawrence Freedman, Honorary Professor of War Studies at King’s College London, told Liga that Ukraine’s ongoing Kursk incursion poses significant problems for Russia, effectively shifting the main battles to Russian territory.
According to Freedman, Ukrainian generals fully understand the risks involved in the Kursk offensive, as well as its enormous potential.
“This creates big problems for the Russians, who turned out to be unprepared to defend their own land,” he said.
The professor emphasized that Russia had committed all its forces to attack Ukraine.
“If the Armed Forces of Ukraine can continue their work in Kursk region, it will inevitably draw Russian forces away from Donbas. It’s a shame for Russia that they are capturing foreign territories but cannot protect their own,” Freedman stated.
He noted that it’s currently difficult to predict what will happen in Ukraine’s Donbas or Russia’s Kursk Oblast. However, he stressed the importance of the fact that the main battles are now taking place not in Ukraine, but in Russia.
Freedman pointed out that this operation has a positive effect on Ukrainian morale after a difficult year for the country.
“It also hits Russian morale. Moscow looks silly. As if it’s cracking at the seams and doesn’t know what to do,” he added.
Moreover, the expert highlighted that this operation has helped Ukraine replenish its prisoner exchange fund and completely nullify the Russian narrative about peace, which implies Ukraine’s de facto capitulation.
“If we talk about new territorial realities, these are Russian lands captured by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, if Ukraine can hold them. This is an important change in the narrative,” Freedman said.
The professor also noted that the Kursk operation challenges many “red lines” created by Russia for Ukraine’s Western partners in this war. He suggested that the operation’s success could lead to the removal of unjustified restrictions on the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Currently, Ukraine is prohibited from using US- and UK/France-supplied missiles against deep rear targets in Russia.
In his opinion, the only restriction the West should impose on weapons is that they must be used “in accordance with the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions.”
Freedman emphasized that while no one assumes the operation will bring Russia to its knees or end Putin’s rule, it has created a significant shift in war narratives.
The original interview was published in Ukrainian, so the direct quotes in this article may not fully correspond to the exact wording from the interview due to double translation.
Related:
- Frontline report: Sudzha city taken, Glushkovo city next
- ISW: Ukrainian military maneuver in Kursk Oblast to compensate for Russia’s advantage
- Zelenskyy: Our partners need to remove barriers preventing us from weakening Russian positions
- Russia struggles to mount serious counter-attacks in Kursk, says Estonian defense official
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.
We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society.
A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support.
