Putin’s nuclear threats may trigger more support for Ukraine, French military expert says
As Moscow broadens its nuclear strike criteria, military analysts reveal a strategic miscalculation: threats meant to deter Western support may instead mobilizing greater international backing for Ukraine's defense.
Russia’s use of nuclear weapons on the front lines offers no practical advantage, while Russian ruler Vladimir Putin’s nuclear threats, intended to intimidate the world, may only strengthen international support for Ukraine, French military expert Xavier Tytelman told Ukrinform.
Following the US decision to allow Ukraine to strike deep within Russian territory, President Vladimir Putin updated Russia’s nuclear doctrine, broadening the criteria for potential nuclear strikes. This revision now includes scenarios where aggression against Russia or its allies is perceived, even if that aggression comes from non-nuclear states allied with NATO.
“Yes, we should take these threats seriously because they are a reality, and we cannot fully estimate Putin’s intentions. However, from a military perspective, they lack credibility. Nuclear weapons hold little strategic value in the context of largely static frontlines. While such an attack could result in hundreds of casualties, organized forces would remain to continue the fight,” Tytelman believes.
He emphasized that Putin’s threats are ultimately aiding Ukraine by mobilizing larger international support.
Ukraine is making it clear to the world that Russia alone bears responsibility for disrupting the global order. Yet, it appears unprepared for the consequences—neither in its relations with China nor with the US, he said, adding that increased support for Ukraine is essential to prevent collapse and deter Russia from using its weapons.
“Put simply, strengthening Ukraine’s resistance today can help avert World War III and the use of nuclear weapons by Russia,” Tytelman added.
He also criticized Ukraine’s allies’ delayed response in providing critical military aid. According to him, Kyiv’s partners have blown every opportunity to supply the necessary equipment. They waited two and a half years to deliver fighter jets and a year and a half to provide close-combat weapons.
“Russia cannot fully conquer Donbas for years to come, but Ukraine currently lacks the resources to reclaim it. This deadlock only prolongs suffering,” the expert concluded.
Earlier, UK Defense Secretary John Healey said Russian nuclear threats should not intimidate Western leaders.
Healey has expressed confidence that Putin “will not win, no matter how long it takes.”
Read also:
- Russia rejects proposals to freeze war against Ukraine
- Trump plans talks with Putin and Zelenskyy to end Russo-Ukrainian war
- Ukraine military deploys dozens of ground robots, UAVs, FPV drones in historic combat operation in Kharkiv Oblast
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.
We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society.
A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support.
