Supreme Court rejects Missouri effort to block sentencing, gag order against Trump in New York case
The Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit filed by the Missouri attorney general to temporarily block legal proceedings against Trump in the New York case.
The Supreme Court denied a motion to step in and rule on a lawsuit brought by the state of Missouri that attempted to temporarily block legal proceedings in the case of New York vs. former President Trump.
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said they would have granted the state's request to file a bill of complaint but would not grant the other relief the state was seeking.
Legal surrogate and attorney for President Donald Trump, David Gelman, said, "It was a Hail Mary effort by the Missouri AG to get [the Supreme Court] to block the legal proceedings. That’s called thinking outside of the box."
"This still doesn’t mean the sentencing will happen in September and if it does, it will be appealed faster than the Democrats dropping Biden," he said.
GORSUCH HAS STERN MESSAGE WHEN ASKED ABOUT BIDEN SUPREME COURT PROPOSALS: 'BE CAREFUL'
The claim was filed by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who is a Republican seeking a full term in the seat this fall.
"It’s disappointing that the Supreme Court refused to exercise its constitutional responsibility to resolve state v. state disputes," Bailey said in a post on X. "I will continue to prosecute our lawsuit against @KamalaHarris @JoeBiden’s DOJ for coordinating the illicit prosecutions against President Trump."
Trump was found guilty by a New York jury in May of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
'NO KINGS ACT': SCHUMER ADVANCES BIDEN SCOTUS OVERHAUL WITH BILL TO STRIP TRUMP’S IMMUNITY
"The investigations and subsequent prosecutions of former President Donald J. Trump appear to have been conducted in coordination with the United States Department of Justice," Bailey alleges, adding that he believes that allegation is demonstrated in part by the move of the third-highest ranking DOJ official, Matthew Colangelo, to the Manhattan DA's office to help prosecute the criminal case, N.Y. v. Trump.
In addition, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg worked alongside New York Attorney General Letitia James in pursuing civil litigation against Trump, using that experience as a springboard from which to campaign for his current position, Bailey had noted.
Bailey argued that Bragg’s decision to bring the prosecution "despite its transparent weakness has nonetheless had the effect of keeping former President Trump off the campaign trail, which President Biden has bragged about."
"Given the timing (Bragg charged Trump only after Trump declared his candidacy for President), the transparent weakness of the charges, and the effect the charges have in keeping Trump off the campaign trail, there is substantial reason to suspect the Biden administration has coordinated with Bragg and others to bring prosecutions against Trump," Bailey had claimed.
