The Economist: Western allies were deliberately left in the dark about Kursk incursion plans

General Syrskyi considered various scenarios for launching an offensive against the Russian defensive line's most vulnerable areas, before deciding on the Kursk incursion, The Economist says citing sources.

Aug 19, 2024 - 08:20
The Economist: Western allies were deliberately left in the dark about Kursk incursion plans

oleksandr syrskyi 21st meeting contact group ukraine's defense april 2024 credit telegram/syrskyi

Ukraine’s Kursk operation was planned in great secrecy by Commander-in-Chief General Oleksandr Syrskyi, The Economist says. Soldiers interviewed by the publication, including those from the 82nd and 80th brigades, reported initial euphoric gains with little serious resistance. These troops described using clever tactics, including FPV drones for air cover, allowing them to sweep through the Russian countryside.

Ukraine’s daring incursion into Russia’s Kursk Oblast, which began on 6 August, has shown initial success and now faces growing challenges, as Ukrainian consolidate the gains and expand the war zone.

Small units probed for vulnerabilities before heavier armor was committed in a “maneuver attack” akin to tactics by Russia’s commander, Valery Gerasimov, and was devastatingly effective for the first five days, according to a source in Ukraine’s General Staff cited by The Economist.

The source said the plan was born out of desperation, with General Syrskyi under pressure due to manpower shortages and crumbling front lines in the Donetsk region.

According to the source, Syrskyi considered several scenarios for an offensive push at the weakest points in the Russian line. These options included a strike in Bryansk Oblast in the north, a strike in Kursk Oblast, a combination of the two, or more. The Economist notes that the main objective was to draw troops away from the Donbas stranglehold and create bargaining chips for any future negotiation.

Earlier, President Zelenskyy claimed that the operation’s goal is to create a buffer zone on the Russian territory.

The Economist reports that Western allies were deliberately left in the dark about the operation. A source close to General Syrskyi stated to the publication,

“Syrskyi had two previous operations undermined by the West. One was leaked to the Russians, and on another occasion, we were instructed to abort.”

After 12 days, progress has slowed, and a new front line is emerging, The Economist notes. Ukrainian soldiers interviewed on the ground reported seeing a different level of resistance, with Russia reinforcing the area with better-trained units, including marines and special forces.

While the operation has diverted some Russian troops from the Donbas, Russia is maintaining heavy pressure on Pokrovsk, a town in eastern Ukraine where it was making steady advances before the incursion. A Ukrainian government source told the publication that military activity in the Donbas has significantly decreased since 16 August, with Pokrovsk being a notable exception.

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!