Ukraine’s victory depends on four pillars of military morale

Maintaining Ukraine's resistance requires not only adequate weapons supply, but tackling Soviet approaches in the army

Jun 27, 2024 - 06:30
Ukraine’s victory depends on four pillars of military morale

Ukrainian soldier eyes

You all remember how two years ago, when Russia launched a full-scale war against Ukraine, Ukrainians surprised the whole world by getting united to defend it. We have seen a unique national uprising, with queues to military conscription centers. No one wanted then, and does not want now, to be under Russia. Because to be under Russia is to be tortured, raped, deprived of our language, identity, history, and culture. To be under Russia is to be killed.

The challenge of maintaining resilience

Today, looking back on two years, I understand that such cohesion, willingness to fight, and resilience are not a given. They cannot be preserved and maintained for a long time naturally without effort.

We feel this especially acutely now when people are tired, when the queues to conscription points disappear, and what seemed easy to achieve in 2022 now seems very far away. Resilience requires special efforts when the population is under constant long-term stress, under the influence of enemy information campaigns, and under ongoing daily physical threats. When every citizen of ours lost someone in the war – either killed, lost, wounded, or displaced.

Now, Ukraine has two battles: one with the external enemy, Russia. The second internal battle concerns changes in approaches, from Soviet to modern Western human-centered ones. This goes for the military, too.
Four factors of Ukraine’s resistance

Resistance depends on the morale of society and, in particular, the army. And morale depends on four main factors:

  1. Training
  2. Leadership
  3. Weapons and ammunition
  4. Military-civil liaison and mature communication

Let’s look at each of them:

1. Training

According to surveys of Ukrainian civilians, one of the main reasons they are afraid to join the army is the lack of proper training. This goes almost equally with another reason—fear of getting an unprofessional, indifferent commander. At the beginning of the full-scale invasion, most of the soldiers came from civilian life, untrained and unprepared for combat. They had only great motivation and desire to protect the country.

Therefore, it is necessary to teach civilians basic knowledge and skills in military affairs throughout their lives.

Also, civilians who join the army are managed by a professional military. Unfortunately, the training of our professional military has not changed significantly since gaining independence. As a result, civilians paid for their indifference to the professional army and its training with their own blood.

Therefore, it is very important to prepare the army’s backbone very well, especially commanders of all ranks, from squad commanders to the commander-in-chief.

2. Leadership

In addition to general military training, we need to nurture and train leaders. This is a very multifaceted and complex factor.

In 1956, the American psychologist Benjamin Bloom developed a hierarchy of cognitive skills. It has six levels. Knowledge is on the first, simplest level. The last two are the most advanced ones—synthesis and evaluation. So, every military leader has to be able to evaluate and plan.

Unfortunately, the Soviet education system taught knowledge but did not teach how to apply this knowledge. It did not teach planning, i.e., creativity. And today, we see the consequences of this in military management.

We still see the influence of the Soviet military culture, which was essentially very autocratic, obedient, and humiliating.

Another thing that hinders the education of modern leaders is the culture within our Armed Forces.

We still see the influence of the Soviet military culture, which was essentially very autocratic, obedient, and humiliating.

If you watch modern Russian films about the military, you will certainly think you are watching a gangster world. This comes from the Soviet Union, where the whole society was criminalized, and the criminal spirit was introduced to the military institutions. And since the army is a very closed institution, it has survived in this state till now in Russia.

And we do our best to squeeze the manifestations of this culture out of us, although it is constantly fighting to stay. We see how modern Ukrainian culture in the army fights against the Soviets. It’s like oil and water; they don’t mix.

Therefore, it is extremely important for us that our partners help us implement the best Western practices in the education of military leaders so that respect, creativity, and critical thinking become core parts of it. Young Ukrainian commanders are insistently demanding this.

In 2014, Ukraine changed its military doctrine and identified Russia as the main threat. However, the combat manuals did not undergo significant changes. Mostly these are Soviet manuals translated into Ukrainian. All of them, since the times of the USSR, are designed for the use of a large number of people.

However, this is something that Ukraine cannot afford. We have to protect people. Our human resources are limited, unlike Russia’s.

Ukraine cannot afford to fight with Soviet methods. We have to protect people. Our human resources are limited, unlike Russia’s.

3. Weapons and ammunition

It is difficult to fight without weapons; this is impossible in modern conditions. Especially if your enemy is the biggest country in the world with a developed military industry.

Since the beginning of the full-scale war, we have lost many capable men and women because we did not have enough weapons. Weapons must be modern and technological in order to destroy a lot and efficiently. And there shouldn’t be a deficit of it. Unfortunately, we have to cover entire defense areas with people, but we could cover them with technologies.

Apart from the USA, there is not a single country that can provide enough weapons for itself, considering how Russia takes weapons from Iran, North Korea, and China.

Fighting spirit is influenced by the ability to destroy the enemy, but without weapons, it’s impossible.

Even if there is a great advantage in the number of people, shortages of weapons will ruin the spirit. On the contrary, tactical victories with the use of weapons raise morale.
Ukraine's resilience military culture soviet
Liubov Tsybulska speaks about Ukraine’s resilience at a conference in Sweden
4. Military-civilian liaison and mature communication

In our country, the war is managed by the President de jure. However, de facto, it is managed by generals. Generals make mistakes, in particular, in the consumption of resources (human and material) and the strategy of waging war.

Therefore, it is also important to train politicians and civil society in military affairs. The military must be accountable; they must be controlled.

Morale is key in the struggle. Without it, even with plenty of weapons, it is impossible to win.

Both society and the army must clearly understand the threat and our goals in the war. Our goal must be communicated to everyone. Every soldier in the trench must understand what he is fighting for.

Morale is key in the struggle. Without it, even with plenty of weapons, it is impossible to win. Communication should be honest. It should not distort reality or give too positive a picture of reality if the situation on the battlefield is different.

Better weapons than the enemy, competent and capable commanders who head competently and support their people, good training, and competent use of the good people we have in the Army are the factors that will contribute to high morale.

All these four components contribute to adaptability, hope, and the will to fight. Without them, winning becomes impossible because the main battle is not physical but psychological.

When Russia attacked us two years ago, the first ones who fought were professional military. But then, very soon, the majority of them were wounded or killed, so eventually, they were replaced by civilians.

So, to sum up, I would like to say something that I wish all Ukrainians had known before the war: in peacetime, society should be fully involved and interested in the armed forces, doing everything to ensure that they are prepared. After all, when war comes, it is the civilians who become the Army; it is they who take up arms and go to fight.

Liubov Tsybulska is a Russian warfare expert and First Head of the Centre for Strategic communication and information security under the Ministry of culture and information policy. Prior to joining the government, she led the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group of Ukraine Crisis Media Center.

Editor’s note. The opinions expressed in our Opinion section belong to their authors. Euromaidan Press’ editorial team may or may not share them.

Submit an opinion to Euromaidan Press

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!